Machine Trust Score: Measuring Trust Signals Beyond Domain Authority
Domain Authority and SiteNexis Machine Trust examine different evidence. This SiteNexis diagnostic reviews entity consistency, schema alignment, external validation, contradictions, and trust degradation without claiming to measure private provider confidence.
Domain Authority is a third-party link-equity proxy, while SiteNexis Machine Trust is a separate diagnostic of trust-related evidence characteristics. They answer different questions: one describes link-based authority in a domain model, while the other reviews whether entity, schema, external-validation, and contradiction signals remain coherent. Neither score proves how an AI provider will rank, cite, or recommend a page.
How AI Systems Infer Trust
SiteNexis reviews signal consistency as one practical way to assess machine-facing evidence. It compares your pages, schema markup, sameAs-linked profiles, and accessible external references: do they describe the organisation with the same name, founding date, and category? Does schema match the body text? These checks identify contradictions and gaps for remediation; they do not reveal a provider's private trust model.
Five Dimensions of Machine Trust
- Entity Credibility Consistency — same attributes, same values, across every page and every external profile
- Schema Trust Alignment — schema markup that accurately describes body content without over-claiming
- External Validation Depth — sameAs links that resolve to live, consistent external profiles
- Contradiction Absence — no conflicting claims between pages, schema, and metadata
- Trust Degradation Resistance — no evidence that trust signals have eroded between audit cycles
What Undermines Machine Trust
The most common machine-trust findings are accumulated inconsistencies: an organisation page says "founded in 2018" while schema says "2019"; an Author entity appears in schema but not in the article; or a sameAs link now returns 404. In aggregate, these findings indicate that the domain's evidence model needs review. SiteNexis reports the inconsistency and its likely remediation; it does not assert that every provider applies the same penalty.
▲SiteNexis treats degradation — signals that were removed or corrupted between audits — as a higher-priority diagnostic than a signal that was never present. The resulting score is an internal review signal, not a universal provider penalty.
Improving Machine Trust Score
- 1Audit entity data consistency across all pages — identify every location where your primary entity name, description, and attributes appear
- 2Validate that schema markup matches body text — every schema claim must be verifiable from the page content
- 3Verify that all sameAs links resolve to consistent, live profiles
- 4Establish a governance process for entity data: changes to brand name, description, or founding date must be propagated simultaneously across all surfaces
- 5Run contradiction detection across top pages — conflicting factual claims between pages are a direct trust penalty
SiteNexis Machine Trust Score breaks down all five trust dimensions with per-issue deductions and specific remediation steps.
Run Your Machine Trust Audit